• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

Govtempdiary

  • Home
  • 7th CPC Calculator
  • Pay Matrix
  • AICPIN

8th Pay CommissionPay Matrix
AICPINDA Calculator 2025

BPMS demands to withdraw Clarification regarding admissibility of transport allowance

December 14, 2020 by GEDWEBZIP Leave a Comment

Clarification regarding admissibility of transport allowance during nationwide lockdown due to covid-19 pandemic.

Bharatiya Pratiraksha mazdoor Sangh

(AN ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF DEFENCE WORKERS)

 (AN INDUSTRIAL OF B.M.S)

(RECOGNISED BY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ,GOVT.OF INDIA)

REF: BPMS/MoF/TA/ 49(7/2/R)

Dated: 05.12.2020

To,
The Secretary (Expenditure)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
North Block, New Delhi – 110 011

Subject: Clarification regarding admissibility of Transport Allowance during Nation wide Lockdown due to Covid-19 Pandemic.

Reference: Department of Expenditure Letter No.21/3/2020-E.II (B) dated 01/12/2020.
Sir,
We have for reference the letter cited under reference and submit the following:

An unprecedented situation arose due to Covid-19 due to which the Government took a very thoughtful decision to impose a Nation-wide lockdown w.e.f. 23/03/2020. Guidelines were thereafter issued from time to time on the matter.

As part of the Government decisions/guidelines, Government employees were directed to remain at home and continue rendering their services through the Work-From-Home mode.

In view of the above, the subject clarification is not only distasteful, contrary to existing rules, and contrary to Supreme Court Orders, but is a glaring example of non-application of mind and therefore needs to be quashed.

We submit that extant orders on non admissibility are restricted to the following situation only in case of “Employees during absence from duty for a full calendar month due to Leave under any leave rules/Training/Tour etc…” implying due to personal reasons only.

In the instant case the employees were not absent but were “directed by the authorities” to work from home.

Without prejudice to the above, we draw your attention to the Judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No.11527 of 2014 (arising out of SLP (C) No.11684 of 2012 in State of Punjab and Others etc vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc., and DOP&T Letter No.18/03/20I5 Estt. (Pay-I) dated 02/03/2016 on the subject issue.

It may be pertinent to note that the Para 5 of the above cited DOP&T Instructions clearly mentions that the decision about recoveries has been taken after “express approval of the Department of Expenditure” on their OM dt. 06/02/2014.

In view of the above, it is requested that the subject letter may be withdrawn immediately.

Thanking you

Sincerely Yours
(SADHU SINGH)
Vice-President/ BPMS &
Member National Council

[download id=”118089″ template=”dlm-buttons-button”]

Filed Under: CGE Latest News, HOT NEWS

Recent Posts

  • 8th Pay Commission: Major Salary Hike Expected for Government Employees January 16, 2025
  • CPI-IW November 2024 Update – All-India Consumer Price Index January 6, 2025
  • EPFO UAN Activation 2024: AADHAAR Seeding Guidelines for ELI Scheme December 16, 2024
  • EPS Pension Increase: Updates on Minimum Pension Hike for 2024 December 13, 2024
  • Good News for Ex-Servicemen: ECHS Gets a Major Boost December 12, 2024

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

  • Home
  • 8th Pay Commission
  • 7th CPC Calculator [updated]
  • Pay Matrix
  • Dopt orders
  • DA News
  • AICPIN
  • DA 2024
  • DA Calculator 2025
  • Superannuation Date Calculator

GET FREE EMAIL UPDATE

Secondary Sidebar

Categories

Copyright © 2010–2025 - Central Government Employees News - Govtempdiary